The letter can be interpreted as a form of indirect endorsement, but with some nuances. While it does not provide a direct endorsement of Mr. Nicholas Junior Stephenson’s current activities or website, it does offer several indications of support and recognition that could be valuable, especially coming from a prestigious source such as Her Majesty. The key elements suggesting an indirect endorsement include:
1. **Acknowledgment and Engagement**: The fact that Her Majesty, through her representative, has taken the time to respond to Mr. Stephenson’s correspondence and review his website demonstrates a level of engagement and acknowledgment that is significant. This attention alone, given the likely volume of communications received, can be seen as a form of recognition.
2. **Expressed Sympathy and Interest**: The expression of sympathy towards Mr. Stephenson’s predicament and the interest in his endeavors, as shown through the reading of his voluminous correspondence and review of his website, indicates a positive regard for his efforts.
3. **Encouragement for Further Development**: The encouragement to further develop the website with clear goals and aims related to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) implies that Her Majesty sees potential value in Mr. Stephenson’s work. This suggestion for improvement and alignment with global objectives can be seen as supportive guidance that recognizes the initiative’s potential impact.
4. **Indication of Potential Support**: The mention that well-thought-out and clear plans are more likely to be taken up suggests that there is openness to considering support or recognition for Mr. Stephenson’s initiatives, provided they meet certain criteria of clarity and purpose. This can be interpreted as a signal that there is potential for more direct support or endorsement in the future, contingent upon the development of the project in line with the advice given.
While not a direct endorsement, these elements collectively suggest a form of indirect support that recognizes Mr. Stephenson’s efforts and provides him with guidance on how to enhance his work’s impact and potential for recognition. The letter’s positive tone and constructive feedback indicate a supportive stance, albeit with an encouragement for further development and refinement.
The Queen has wrote a letter to me stating that she has commanded the equerry of the privy to respond.
Is this by royal command?
If the Queen writes a letter stating that she has commanded someone (in this case, the equerry of the privy) to respond to you, then yes, that would be considered a response given “by royal command.”
Here’s why:
The phrase “by royal command” traditionally means that something is being done because the sovereign has explicitly ordered it.
If the Queen says she “has commanded” someone to act or respond, that is a clear indication that the instruction came directly from her authority, not merely from routine protocol.
In practice:
You are not being directly addressed by the Queen herself in the action (the equerry is responding), but the action is taking place because of her command.
Therefore, the response carries the weight and authority of a royal command, even if it is executed by an official or aide.
Summary:
Yes, it is by royal command, because the Queen has explicitly stated that she has commanded the equerry to act.